Service 04
Rejected Wikipedia Draft & Deleted Article Assessment
If your draft was declined, deleted, tagged or challenged, resubmitting the same material is the worst move. We read the decline reasons, the draft history and the deletion discussion, then tell you what actually went wrong and whether it can be repaired.
Free initial assessment • No obligation • Confidential
Scope
What This Service Covers
- ✓Review of decline messages, reviewer comments and deletion discussions
- ✓Diagnosis: sourcing, notability, tone, copyright or conduct
- ✓Honest verdict on whether resubmission is viable
- ✓If viable, a repair plan grounded in new or overlooked sources
- ✓If not viable, what would need to change first
FAQs
Common Questions
My draft was rejected three times. Is it hopeless?
Not necessarily, but repeated declines without new sourcing are a warning sign. We look for what previous attempts missed; if there is nothing new, we say so.
Can a deleted article be recreated?
Only when the reasons for deletion no longer apply — usually because substantial new independent coverage has appeared. Recreating without that invites speedy deletion.
Someone else wrote the draft. Does that matter?
The draft’s history follows the subject, and reviewers can see it. Understanding that history is part of the assessment.
Before You Commit
Find Out Whether Wikipedia Is Realistic Before Anyone Writes a Word.
Send your name or organisation and any coverage. We’ll tell you whether Wikipedia makes sense now, later, or not at all.
Check My Wikipedia EligibilityFree assessment • Usually reviewed within 1 business day • Confidential